"Q: The 2014 Platform of the Republican Party of Texas says, 'Homosexuality is a chosen behavior that is contrary to the fundamental unchanging truths that have been ordained by God in the Bible, recognized by our nation’s founders, and shared by the majority of Texans.... ' Do you agree with this statement?"
At that, the statement represents a degree of moderation from the 2010 platform, which says, "We believe that the practice of homosexuality tears at the fabric of society, contributes to the breakdown
of the family unit, and leads to the spread of dangerous, communicable diseases." It then goes on to talk about the fundamental unchanging truths, etc. I always hoped that someone would ask Ron Paul about this in 2012.
By the way, does anyone know where they're getting this stuff about our nation's founders?
If you start looking the 2014 platform, though, you can find all kinds of statements that a national Presidential candidate would probably prefer not to deal with, at least during the general election:
"We support eliminating bureaucratic prohibitions on corporal discipline and home
schooling in foster homes."
"We support an immediate and orderly transition to a system of private pensions based on the concept of individual retirement accounts, and gradually phasing out the Social Security tax."
"We urge the legislature to end censorship of discussion of religion in
our founding documents and encourage discussing those documents, including the Bible as their
basis. Students and district personnel have the right to display Christian items on school
property."
"We oppose any sex education other than the biology of reproduction and abstinence
until marriage."
But why go on? This is the full right-wing-crank stuff. Supporting those positions probably wouldn't damage Cruz or Perry at all in the Republican primaries. But that's interesting in itself, no?
No comments:
Post a Comment